Home Home > GIT Browse
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>2004-02-15 21:46:43 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@evo.osdl.org>2004-02-15 21:46:43 -0800
commit1e99d97a0ad41992c62f476c632019222be76d8f (patch)
tree061f422596a8cb3b10b1b95a384e47d4f8854c53
parente38bead1169ae08dea3e2054a05c93605e368332 (diff)
[PATCH] ide-tape: warn about soon to be removed OnStream support
I see only pros of removing OnStream support: - SCSI osst.c driver is actively maintained by Willem Riede <wrlk@riede.org> - there is no functionality loss (OnStream IDE drives don't support DSC) - ide-tape.c driver is too ugly & complicated even without OnStream support - long term benefits (2.7.x plans on unifying storage drivers)
-rw-r--r--drivers/ide/ide-tape.c12
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
index bd4b9dfc70a6..ad976e3f052a 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
@@ -6442,12 +6442,12 @@ static int idetape_attach (ide_drive_t *drive)
goto failed;
}
if (drive->scsi) {
- if (strstr(drive->id->model, "OnStream DI-")) {
- printk("ide-tape: ide-scsi emulation is not supported for %s.\n", drive->id->model);
- } else {
- printk("ide-tape: passing drive %s to ide-scsi emulation.\n", drive->name);
- goto failed;
- }
+ printk("ide-tape: passing drive %s to ide-scsi emulation.\n", drive->name);
+ goto failed;
+ }
+ if (strstr(drive->id->model, "OnStream DI-")) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "ide-tape: Use drive %s with ide-scsi emulation and osst.\n", drive->name);
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "ide-tape: OnStream support will be removed soon from ide-tape!\n");
}
tape = (idetape_tape_t *) kmalloc (sizeof (idetape_tape_t), GFP_KERNEL);
if (tape == NULL) {