Home Home > GIT Browse
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLarry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>2017-04-08 11:07:43 -0500
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2017-04-09 09:26:29 +0200
commitef9209b642f13fc293b27612d7d1d4c9de1b5b75 (patch)
tree3a827f072999ffe1b7a1cab523f58e96cf6182f3
parent3498d6844cbb19b64dfc3dc73d222de461f7068a (diff)
staging: rtl8723bs: Fix indenting errors and an off-by-one mistake in core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
Smatch lists the following: CHECK drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:525 _mgt_dispatcher() warn: inconsistent indenting drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:1595 OnAssocReq() error: buffer overflow 'pstapriv->sta_aid' 32 <= 32 drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:2391 dump_mgntframe_and_wait() warn: inconsistent indenting drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:2420 dump_mgntframe_and_wait_ack() warn: inconsistent indenting drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:4969 process_80211d() error: testing array offset 'i' after use. drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:5738 linked_status_chk() warn: inconsistent indenting drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:6459 sitesurvey_cmd_hdl() warn: inconsistent indenting The indenting problems were fixed with white-space changes. The error at line 1595 was the result of an off-by-one error in a for loop. The error at line 4969 was not fixed as that code lies inside a block of code that only is needed for 5G channels. This chip only works at 2.4 GHz. Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r--drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c25
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
index e0a3cd64777f..18e78d5198c3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
@@ -522,15 +522,14 @@ static void _mgt_dispatcher(struct adapter *padapter, struct mlme_handler *ptabl
u8 bc_addr[ETH_ALEN] = {0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff};
u8 *pframe = precv_frame->u.hdr.rx_data;
- if (ptable->func) {
- /* receive the frames that ra(a1) is my address or ra(a1) is bc address. */
- if (memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), myid(&padapter->eeprompriv), ETH_ALEN) &&
- memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), bc_addr, ETH_ALEN))
- return;
-
- ptable->func(padapter, precv_frame);
- }
+ if (ptable->func) {
+ /* receive the frames that ra(a1) is my address or ra(a1) is bc address. */
+ if (memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), myid(&padapter->eeprompriv), ETH_ALEN) &&
+ memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), bc_addr, ETH_ALEN))
+ return;
+ ptable->func(padapter, precv_frame);
+ }
}
void mgt_dispatcher(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *precv_frame)
@@ -1575,7 +1574,7 @@ unsigned int OnAssocReq(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *precv_frame)
if (pstat->aid > 0) {
DBG_871X(" old AID %d\n", pstat->aid);
} else {
- for (pstat->aid = 1; pstat->aid <= NUM_STA; pstat->aid++)
+ for (pstat->aid = 1; pstat->aid < NUM_STA; pstat->aid++)
if (pstapriv->sta_aid[pstat->aid - 1] == NULL)
break;
@@ -2388,7 +2387,7 @@ s32 dump_mgntframe_and_wait(struct adapter *padapter, struct xmit_frame *pmgntfr
pxmitbuf->sctx = NULL;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pxmitpriv->lock_sctx, irqL);
- return ret;
+ return ret;
}
s32 dump_mgntframe_and_wait_ack(struct adapter *padapter, struct xmit_frame *pmgntframe)
@@ -2417,7 +2416,7 @@ s32 dump_mgntframe_and_wait_ack(struct adapter *padapter, struct xmit_frame *pmg
mutex_unlock(&pxmitpriv->ack_tx_mutex);
}
- return ret;
+ return ret;
}
static int update_hidden_ssid(u8 *ies, u32 ies_len, u8 hidden_ssid_mode)
@@ -5735,7 +5734,7 @@ void linked_status_chk(struct adapter *padapter)
#else
rx_chk_limit = 8;
#endif
- link_count_limit = 7; /* 16 sec */
+ link_count_limit = 7; /* 16 sec */
/* Marked by Kurt 20130715 */
/* For WiDi 3.5 and latered on, they don't ask WiDi sink to do roaming, so we could not check rx limit that strictly. */
@@ -6456,7 +6455,7 @@ u8 sitesurvey_cmd_hdl(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pbuf)
Switch_DM_Func(padapter, DYNAMIC_FUNC_DISABLE, false);
/* config the initial gain under scaning, need to write the BB registers */
- initialgain = 0x1e;
+ initialgain = 0x1e;
rtw_hal_set_hwreg(padapter, HW_VAR_INITIAL_GAIN, (u8 *)(&initialgain));